hash locked multisig, can one cosigner sign without the pre-image?

hash locked multisig, can one cosigner sign without the pre-image?

Consider Alice and Bob created the following native segwit script:

hash SHA256 defined as H | Alice PubKey | Bob Pubkey

Only Bob has the pre-image (plain text that hashes [sha256] to H). Can Alice just sign a transaction without revealing H, and just hand over the partially signed transaction off chain to Bob so he can reveal H + add his signature, make the transaction final and spend it?

The catch here is that neither Alice and Bob to be in total and exclusive control of the funds, but for Bob to have to reveal an additional secret as spending condition.

http://ift.tt/2DNiK2m

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

sendrawtransaction and txn-mempool-conflict

sendrawtransaction and txn-mempool-conflict When i sendrawtransaction to bitcoind, i get error (exceptions) 18: txn-mempool-conflict (use Bitcoin JSON-RPC denpamusic/php-bitcoinrpc ) But the transaction is sent to the network and is subsequently confirmed. Example one decoded transaction : https://jsfiddle.net/rn58a4j6/ then i send this transaction: 94ec12fc463230b4285a29b047608627c05572a4c6eabe6688a201ce49ae72f7 https://ift.tt/2MY2KP0
Read more

couldn't connect to server: EOF reached (code 1)

couldn't connect to server: EOF reached (code 1) I'm running a full node on my raspberry pi3. I try to do a simple command such as bitcoin-cli getblockchaininfo but I always get this error: error: couldn't connect to server: EOF reached (code 1) (make sure server is running and you are connecting to the correct RPC port) My bitcoin.conf file looks like this: Bitcoind options server=1 daemon=1 reindex-chainstate=1 reindex=1 txindex=1 disablewallet=1 listenonion=0 Connection settings rpcuser= * rpcpassword=* rpcport=8332 rpcallowip=127.0.0.1 rpcthreads=10 I also tried to get a command with "bitcoin-cli -rpcuser: * - rpcpassword=* -rpcportt8332 getblockchaininfo". But this also didn't work. Does someone has some advice or experience with this error? https://ift.tt/2D82TLW
Read more